Minnesota Historical Society M-Flame Logo

Home / State Historic Preservation Office » Review and Compliance

SHPO

Minnesota State Preservation Office Weblog

Review and Compliance

Archived Posts from this Category

SHPO Presents at DEED Training Workshops

Posted byLeslie Coburn on 10 Jul 2013 | Tagged as: Review and Compliance, SHPO Out & About

State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Staff–Mary Ann Heidemann, Kelly Gragg-Johnson, and Leslie Coburn–met face-to-face with grants administrators from Greater Minnesota who frequently send projects to SHPO for review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (1966).  The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) had invited SHPO environmental review staff to explain compliance with federal preservation law at training workshops held June 18-20, 2013, in Bemidji, Alexandria, and Mankato.  Workshop attendees administer grants funded by the federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) agency and distributed by DEED through a program that targets areas within smaller communities for rehabilitation and economic development, called the Small Cities Development Program.  Consultation with SHPO about the impact program activities may have on historic properties, in compliance with the Preservation Act,  is just one of the many program requirements grants administrators must follow.  Coincidentally, while in the Bemidji area, manager Mary Ann Heidemann collected an award from the US Dept. of Agriculture’s Forest Service recognizing her participation, through Section 106 process, in planning for the sensitive rehabilitation of the Rabideau CCC Camp, a National Historic Landmark in Chippewa National Forest.

Eye-popping Number of Projects

Posted byLeslie Coburn on 12 Dec 2012 | Tagged as: Review and Compliance

 

Mary Ann Heidemann, Leslie Coburn, and Kelly Gragg-Johnson

Mary Ann Heidemann, Leslie Coburn, and Kelly Gragg-Johnson

At the end of every fiscal year, the Compliance team sends a year’s worth of projects to archives to make room in its cramped files for another year’s worth of work—typically 3,000 to 4,000 projects.  Here, Manager Mary Ann Heidemann, Leslie Coburn, and Kelly Gragg-Johnson, with tears in their weary eyes, give a fond farewell to 15 boxes of projects from 2007.  For the past few years, camera-shy volunteer Kathy Matson has been preparing the boxes for their journey.  (We offered Kathy a Droopy Eyes disguise for her photo, but she didn’t go for it.)

 

The stack of boxes will be higher when the 2010 files are archived.  Federal stimulus funds (via the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009) caused the number of projects to spike to just over 5,000.  Residential rehabilitations and demolitions accounted for the majority of federal stimulus projects, followed closely by energy-related projects, such as small wind turbines, geothermal systems, and weatherization.

webfilesarchives

106 Success Story - Four Agencies, One Goal: Restoring the St. Croix Recreation Demonstration Area, Hinckley, Minnesota

Posted byJoe Hoover on 30 Nov 2012 | Tagged as: Review and Compliance

The following post is from FEMA Region V, in conjunction with the National Park Service Midwest Region, the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.

The Story

During the evening of July 1, 2011, storms accompanied by straight-line winds at speeds of more than 100 miles per hour tore through the St. Croix Recreational Demonstration Area (RDA), felling trees, blocking roadways, and damaging buildings across the park. Temporary closure of the park due to a budget stalemate just prior to the storm assured that there was no injury to park patrons, but the park’s facilities were significantly damaged. The storm devastated buildings directly and also produced tons of woody debris which further damaged structures throughout the park, a National Historic Landmark with an almost 80-year history.

In 1934, 18,000 acres of land midway between Minneapolis–St. Paul and Duluth were acquired for the development of the St. Croix RDA. During the New Deal, the National Park Service (NPS) planned 46 such parks as part of a program that sought to create jobs while repurposing marginal agricultural lands for recreational use. The RDAs were established with careful consideration of topography, viewsheds, and future reforestation. Swimming pools, open meadows, separate hiking and bridle trails, roads and plantings were developed in these parks to provide opportunities for outdoor sports and activities, particularly for children from urban areas.

01 02

Pre-disaster photos of an Adirondack at Crooked Creek and the Superintendent’s Cabin at Headquarters Area.

St. Croix ultimately became a state park and eventually grew to 30,000 acres, with many Rustic-Style structures built by the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Works Progress Administration to serve as campgrounds, lodges, group centers and administrative areas. The St. Croix RDA’s 164 extant historic structures, roads and trails comprise the most extensive collection of individual New Deal projects in Minnesota, and they are located within one of the largest and best examples of RDA planning and design in the country. The park’s significance is reflected in the listing of one section of the park as a district on the National Register of Historic Places in 1989 and the subsequent designation of the entire park as a National Historic Landmark (NHL) in 1997.

The park’s historic and architectural significance is reflected in the Rustic-Style structures, trails and recreational areas, much of which were damaged in the July 1 storms. On July 28, the president declared a major disaster for Minnesota, making federal funding available on a cost-sharing basis to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which is responsible for maintaining the park.

03 04

Storm damage to Adirondack cabin at Crooked Creek and the Superintendent’s Cabin at Headquarters Area.

The Project

It took weeks of steady effort to clear debris so DNR staff could even begin an assessment of damage to historic structures within the park. Within two months, the park was again open to visitors but with the damaged buildings cordoned off. At that point, the work to define specific repairs to the many damaged Rustic Style buildings in the park had only begun. The damaged structures included simple Adirondack- type shelters, masonry and log cabins, bicycle and picnic shelters, and administrative buildings. Most structures suffered damage to roofing systems, though two were completely leveled by the storm, and two were damaged beyond repair, requiring the complete dismantling and salvage of their remains prior to complete reconstruction. The number of resources affected and the variation in the types of damage sustained complicated recovery efforts as well as the reviews required to assure that repairs met the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. The goal of these reviews was to protect the character-defining features of the individual structures, thereby maintaining the integrity of the park as a whole.

05 06

Damage to Cabins A-2 andC-2 at St. John’s Landing.

The 106 Process

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was on the ground soon after the disaster declaration to provide support as the DNR continued its work and assessed the damage to historic structures. As part of regular disaster operations, the public was notified of and asked to comment on FEMA’s intent to use federal funding for disaster recovery projects, including those that could affect historic properties, such as the St. Croix RDA. In addition, section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) requires the federal agency to notify the Secretary of the Interior when federal funding will affect an NHL. As the extent of the damage became clear, FEMA’s Regional Environmental Officer (REO), responsible for overseeing the agency’s compliance with the NHPA, reached out to the NPS Midwest Office, the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, the Minnesota State Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, and the DNR to review the projects being developed and to discuss ways to assure that the many historic structures damaged by the storm would be appropriately repaired.

Beginning with building inventories maintained by the DNR and working closely with the state and FEMA’s Public Assistance Branch, FEMA’s environmental review staff prepared summaries of proposed treatment measures and coordinated review with the consulting parties. As the DNR identified programs of repairs for individual resources or groups of resources and shared those with the consulting parties, FEMA managed discussions of those treatment measures through a series of conference calls and email exchanges.

Winter storms limited access to the park and therefore project development. Beginning in February, 2012, and continuing through July, the consulting parties gathered regularly to review repair specifications and discuss treatment measures to assure that the historic character of the RDA would not be compromised by the repairs. This level of engagement, driven by the DNR’s plans for repairs and managed by FEMA’s environmental review staff, resulted in the timely review of nearly 60 separate grant projects affecting almost half of the structures in the RDA.

07 08

Damage to Lodge A at St. John’s Landing, St. Croix Recreation Demonstration Area.

The Success

The scope of work and treatment measures for each project were formally documented, providing clarity regarding the expected outcomes of the repairs, whether they involved work as simple as the replacement of roofing shingles or as complex as the complete disassembly and reconstruction of buildings which suffered serious structural damage. After approval of the final project, a summary of treatment measures was developed to provide a record of the decisions made by the consulting parties.

As work continues on repairs over a year after the storms did their damage, the process followed by the consulting parties assures that repairs will maintain the park’s integrity, and that a record of these treatment measures will be available as guidelines for future repairs and maintenance.

Despite the damage sustained in the summer of 2011, the Section 106 process successfully addressed damage to the park’s historic resources, preserving an important part of our nation’s history. That success allows the park to continue providing opportunities for outdoor recreation as originally envisioned almost 80 years ago. The consulting parties, guided by the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, preserved St. Croix’s place as the best example of RDA design and planning and maintained its collection of architecturally-significant Rustic-Style buildings for the enjoyment of future generations.

09 10

Repairs to Lodge A at St. John’s Landing, in progress (left) and complete (right).

R&C 2012: Archaeology of the John Orth & Germania Breweries

Posted byJoe Hoover on 20 Sep 2012 | Tagged as: Podcasts, Review and Compliance

Review and Compliance Cultural Resource Management Seminar presentation by Michelle Terrell of the Two Pines Resource Group.

A paved parking lot and the lawns of a city park hide from sight the remains of two of Minneapolis’ foremost breweries. In 1890, the John Orth and Germania breweries merged with two other breweries to form the Minneapolis Brewing Company (aka Grain Belt). This presentation will provide an overview of the history of these breweries and how documentary and archaeological research led to the identification and evaluation of these sites. It will also discuss how these significant discoveries are being integrated into development plans.

R&C 2011: Archaeological Issues - Cable Plow Panel

Posted byJoe Hoover on 09 May 2011 | Tagged as: Podcasts, Review and Compliance, Seminar

Review and Compliance Cultural Resource Management Seminar - Panel at the 2011 Review and Compliance Cultural Resource Management Seminar on impact of cable plowing on  historic archaeological sites.

  • David Mather, Facilitator and SHPO Archaeologist
  • Elisse Aune, Mille Lacs Tribal Historic Preservation Office
  • Christina Harrison, Archaeological Research Services
  • Richard Rothaus, Trefoil Cultural Consultants

Archaeological Issues - Cable Plow Panel from Minnesota Historical Society on Vimeo.

R&C 2011: Architectural Issues - Visual Impact Panel

Posted byJoe Hoover on 06 May 2011 | Tagged as: Podcasts, Review and Compliance, Seminar

Review and Compliance Cultural Resource Management Seminar - The panel discusses techniques to assess and avoid visual disturbances from modern amenities including mobile cell antennas and towers. The design process for the replacement of the historic Lyndale Avenue Bridge over Minnehaha Creek in Minneapolis is also presented.

  • Mary Ann Heidemann, Facilitator and Compliance Unit Manager
  • Matt Bartus, Pinnacle Engineering
  • Garneth Peterson, Mn/DOT Cultural Resource Unit

PowerPoint slides (PDF)

Architectural Issues - Visual Impact Panel from Minnesota Historical Society on Vimeo.

R&C 2011: Introductions and Partner Input for 2012-2017 Statewide Preservation Plan

Posted byJoe Hoover on 05 May 2011 | Tagged as: Podcasts, Review and Compliance

Review and Compliance Cultural Resource Management Seminar - Welcome by Britta Bloomberg, Deputy SHPO - Introduction to Compliance Unit Staff and Roles - Update on Current Review Practices - Introduction to the Planning Process: Britta Bloomberg - Facilitator:  Mike Koop, SHPO Preservation Program Specialist.

Annual Review and Compliance Cultural Resource Management Seminar

Posted bymheidemann on 11 Mar 2011 | Tagged as: Review and Compliance, Seminar

The Annual Review and Compliance seminars hosted by the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) will resume in a half-day session held on Tuesday, April 26, 2011 in the 3M Auditorium of the Minnesota History Center, from 1:00 to 5:00 pm.

In 2010, the Minnesota SHPO’s Review and Compliance function was restructured to handle a significantly increased workload.  Seminar participants will meet Compliance Staff members, learn their roles and responsibilities, and discuss how best to communicate about project-related issues.  Further, agency and consultant participants will be asked for input into the draft 2012-2017 Statewide Preservation Plan for Minnesota.

Several technical issues involving cultural resource management will be presented, including archaeological review of cable plow projects, managing visual impacts to historic properties, and digital photographic standards for historic property records. Additionally, compliance staff will be available to answer questions, and networking opportunities will be available during the break.

Registration for the seminar is $10, including refreshments.  Register on-line or use the mail-in registration form.

The History Center is open free of charge on Tuesday evenings, so plan to stay after the session to tour our exhibits.  History Center parking is $5, and the café will be open before and after the seminar for those who wish to purchase lunch or a snack.

For more information call Michele Decker at 651-259-3450.