Experiences with Permanent Exhibits
Monday, October 30th, 2006From the H-Public Listserv:
I am doing some thinking about the role of permanent/long-term exhibits at small history museums, particularly local history museums. I have observed that most local history museums feel they need a permanent/long-term overview exhibit that tries to tell the story of their locality. Many of us working in these museums, attempting to re-invent invent our institutions and break out of our reputations as “old-dusty-boring,” often do so by investing in new “permanent” exhibits. These exhibits cost much more than anything else has ever cost in the museum’s history and give us a new centerpiece with which to draw in visitors.
My question: Do these investments pay off? Are “permanent” exhibits an important framework for establishing a local story and an initial contact point for a museum and its visitors? Or do “permanent” exhibits drain resources and inhibit a museum’s ability to remain flexible, relevant and responsive to community needs? I would be interested in hearing about any of your experiences with the role of long-term/permanent exhibits at history museums.
Liora J. Cobin (Brooklyn, NY)



